NSG 6435 Full Course Latest SU

NSG 6435 Week 1 Discussion

Discussion: Pediatric Health-Care Services

This discussion serves as a platform for exploring pertinent topics aligned with the covered course competencies for the week.

Initiate the conversation by posting your initial response in the Discussion Area. Ensure the incorporation of relevant information from your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Properly cite your sources and provide references in APA format, maintaining academic integrity.

Early engagement in the week involves reviewing and responding to your classmates’ postings. Respond thoughtfully to at least two initial postings, contributing to the discussion by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting a well-reasoned point of view, challenging aspects, or highlighting relationships between different lines of reasoning. Support your responses with citations.

Utilize your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library to conduct research on the specified topics:

  1. Sources of pediatric primary care in the United States
  2. Current status of pediatric health-care services in the United States
  3. Barriers to health care for children in the United States

Upon completing your research, address the following questions:

  • What constitutes the sources of pediatric primary care in the United States, and are these sources adequate for delivering health-care services to the pediatric population? Provide reasoning for your stance.
  • Identify specific pediatric populations that may lack access to health-care services and elucidate the reasons behind this disparity.
  • Explore the barriers hindering children’s access to health-care services in the United States. Delve into the underlying reasons for the existence of these barriers.

NSG 6435 Week 2 Discussion

This week’s discussion focuses on the iHuman Case Study – Developmental Assessment and Biological Functioning, aligning with the course competencies and objectives.

Ensure to post your initial response in the designated Discussion Area (NSG 6435). Support your insights with references from the course textbook readings and the South University Online Library, maintaining proper APA format citations.

Engage actively by reviewing and responding to classmates’ postings early in the week. Foster discussion by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting viewpoints with rationales, challenging aspects, or highlighting relationships between different lines of reasoning. In your responses to peers, cite relevant sources.

Complete your participation for this assignment by actively contributing to the discussion.

For this assignment, you will be working on the iHuman case study “Buddy (Theodore, Jr.) VE.”

Apply the knowledge gained from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Significance of Developmental Assessment:

  • Why is developmental assessment crucial in delivering primary care to infants, children, and adolescents?
    • What are the key components of developmental assessment based on the child’s age?

Assessment Tools for Development:

  • Which tools will you employ to assess specific developmental components like speech, motor skills, and social skills?
    • Share your perspective on the accuracy of these tools in evaluating developmental components and explain your choice.

Biological Functioning Assessment:

  • What components would you consider in assessing the basic biological functioning and overall well-being of pediatric patients?
    • Elaborate on the importance of these components in delivering primary health-care services to children.

Utilize the iHuman case study experience to enhance your understanding of evidence-based primary care, clinical reasoning, and patient care planning. Note that content from iHuman cases may be incorporated into quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam, making it a valuable aspect of your learning journey.

NSG 6435 Week 3 Discussion

Discussion: MedU Case Study – Developmental Evaluation and Screening

This week’s discussion revolves around the MedU Case Study – Developmental Evaluation and Screening, aligning with the covered course competencies.

Ensure to initiate the discussion by posting your initial response in the designated Discussion Area. Support your insights with references from the course textbook readings and the South University Online Library, adhering to APA format citation guidelines.

Actively participate in the discourse by engaging with classmates’ posts early in the week. Respond thoughtfully to at least two initial postings, contributing questions, clarification statements, reasoned points of view, challenges to discussion aspects, or highlighting relationships between different lines of reasoning. Citations of relevant sources in responses to peers are encouraged.

Complete your participation for this assignment by actively contributing to the discussion.

For this assignment, you will be working on the MedU case study “FmCase 2: Infant well-child (2, 6, and 9 months) – Asia.”

Apply insights gained from the MedU Case Study to address the following questions:

Child’s Well-Child Visit History:

  • Discuss the history you would gather for Asia in preparation for the well-child visit.
    • Include questions pertaining to her growth and development that are suitable for her age.

Developmental Assessment:

  • Describe the developmental tool chosen for Asia, detailing its reliability and validity.
    • Provide insights into how Asia scored developmentally on this tool and assess whether she is developmentally appropriate for her age.

Immunizations and Patient Education:

  • Outline the immunizations scheduled for Asia at this visit.
    • Discuss the patient education aspects and propose a plan for follow-up.

Utilize the MedU case study experience to further your grasp of evidence-based primary care, clinical reasoning, and the formulation of patient care plans. Note that content from MedU cases may be integrated into quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam, making it a valuable component of your learning journey.

NSG 6435 Week 4 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – HEENT and Respiratory Infections

This discussion serves as a platform to explore pertinent topics aligned with the week’s course competencies. Ensure your active participation by posting your initial response in the dedicated Discussion Area.

Support your insights with references from the course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Adhere to APA format citation guidelines when citing sources in your work.

Initiate engagement by promptly reviewing and responding to your classmates’ postings. Respond substantively to at least two initial postings, contributing by posing questions, offering clarification statements, presenting a well-reasoned point of view with a rationale, challenging aspects of the discussion, or highlighting relationships between different lines of reasoning. Remember to cite sources in your responses to peers.

Complete your participation for this assignment by actively contributing to the discussion.

For this assignment, focus on the iHuman case study titled “Katherine Harris.”

Apply insights from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Diseases:

  • Do you advocate for a limited or involved use of antibiotics in treating these diseases and unconfirmed bacterial illnesses? Why or why not?
    • Explore standards related to antibiotic use in the pediatric population. What assessment findings would justify prescribing antibiotics for asthma symptoms?

Asthma Action Plan:

  • Drawing from national guidelines and evidence-based literature, develop an Asthma Action Plan tailored to this patient.

Wheezing in Children:

  • Discuss whether the etiology, diagnosis, and management of a wheezing child vary based on age. Provide reasoning for your stance.
    • Identify which objective clinical findings will guide your diagnosis and explain why.
    • Determine when a chest x-ray is indicated in this case, considering the presented scenario.

Immerse yourself in the iHuman case study experience to enhance your clinical reasoning, diagnostic skills, and the formulation of evidence-based patient care plans. Content from iHuman cases may influence quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam, making it a valuable component of your learning journey in the NSG 6435 course.

NSG 6435 Week 5 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders in Children

This discussion forum offers an opportunity to delve into relevant topics aligned with this week’s course competencies. Ensure your active participation by initiating your response in the dedicated Discussion Area.

Support your insights with references from the course textbook readings and the South University Online Library, adhering to APA format citation guidelines.

Kickstart your engagement by reviewing and responding promptly to your classmates’ postings. Contribute substantively to at least two initial postings, fostering discussion by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting well-reasoned viewpoints with rationales, challenging aspects, or highlighting connections between lines of reasoning. Ensure proper citation of sources in your responses.

Successfully complete your participation for this assignment through active engagement in the discussion.

For this assignment, focus on the iHuman case study titled “Robert Ross.”

Apply insights from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Diagnostic Inquiry:

  • Formulate relevant questions to gather crucial diagnostic information from Robert Ross, the 17-year-old male presenting with acute chest pain, palpitations, fever, and malaise.

Diagnosis and Management:

  • Outline your approach to diagnosing and managing this adolescent male with symptoms of palpitations, fever, and malaise.

Recommended Diagnostic Studies:

  • Propose the diagnostic studies and labs you would recommend for Robert, providing a comprehensive rationale for each.

Concerning Findings:

  • Identify physical exam findings and diagnostic results that would be concerning, elucidating the reasons behind your concerns.
    • Provide three potential differentials for this case, and highlight additional life-threatening diagnoses crucial to consider when a patient presents with acute chest pain.

Treatment and Education:

  • Detail the recommended treatment plan for Robert, including the rationale behind your choices.
    • Discuss the educational aspects for Robert’s family regarding his condition.

Immerse yourself in the iHuman case study to fortify your clinical reasoning, diagnostic skills, and ability to construct evidence-based patient care plans. The interactive nature of iHuman assignments integrates with quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam, contributing significantly to your overall learning experience in NSG 6435.Top of Form

NSG 6435 Week 6 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Common Pediatric Illnesses

This discussion forum serves as a platform for exploring pertinent topics aligned with this week’s course competencies. Initiate the conversation by posting your initial response in the dedicated Discussion Area.

Ensure the depth of your insights by utilizing resources from your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Adhere to APA format for proper citation of sources in your work.

Engage actively with your peers by reviewing and responding to their postings early in the week. Foster meaningful discussion by responding to at least two classmates’ initial postings. Participate by posing questions, providing clarifications, offering well-reasoned viewpoints with rationales, challenging aspects, or highlighting connections between lines of reasoning. Cite relevant sources in your responses.

Complete your participation for this assignment with diligence.

For this assignment, delve into the iHuman case study titled “Samantha Graves, Gastroenteritis”.

Apply insights from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Pediatric Patient Assessment:

  • Identify essential questions for pediatric patients or caregivers when the presenting complaint is bloody diarrhea. Discuss whether these questions vary based on the child’s age, justifying your stance.

Clinical or Historical Findings for Diagnostic Studies:

  • Determine the clinical or historical findings that indicate the necessity for diagnostic studies in cases of bloody diarrhea. Specify the initial diagnostic studies you would order and provide reasons for your choices.

Differential Diagnoses:

  • Propose three potential differential diagnoses for the presented case of gastroenteritis with bloody diarrhea.

Vomiting Causes Across Age Groups:

  • Explore the variations in common causes of vomiting in infants, children, and adolescents. Discuss the clinical or historical findings that signal the need for diagnostic studies and outline the initial diagnostic studies you would recommend, substantiating your choices.

NSG 6435 Week 8 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

This discussion platform facilitates exploration of pertinent topics aligned with this week’s course competencies. Initiate the conversation by posting your initial response in the designated Discussion Area.

Ensure the depth of your insights by utilizing resources from your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Adhere to APA format for proper citation of sources in your work.

Engage actively with your peers by reviewing and responding to their postings early in the week. Foster meaningful discussion by responding to at least two classmates’ initial postings. Participate by posing questions, providing clarifications, offering well-reasoned viewpoints with rationales, challenging aspects, or highlighting connections between lines of reasoning. Cite relevant sources in your responses.

Complete your participation for this assignment with diligence.

For this assignment, immerse yourself in the iHuman case study titled “Timothy Adams, VE”.

Apply insights from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Best Course of Action:

  • Evaluate and articulate your best course of action for Timothy Adams’ appointment.

Diagnostic Studies:

  • Identify clinical or historical findings that would indicate the need for diagnostic studies. Specify the diagnostic studies you would initially order and provide a rationale for your choices.

Differential Diagnoses:

  • Propose three potential differential diagnoses relevant to Timothy Adams’ case.

NSG 6435 Week 9 Discussion

Discussion: Infectious Diseases in Children

This discussion opportunity serves as a platform for delving into pertinent topics aligned with this week’s course competencies.

For effective engagement, utilize resources from your course, textbook readings, and the South University Online Library. Employ proper citation in APA format for all sources referenced in your work.

Initiate your involvement early in the week by reviewing and responding to your classmates’ postings. Foster a rich discussion environment by responding to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Actively participate in the discourse by posing questions, offering clarifications, providing viewpoints with rationales, challenging discussion aspects, or establishing connections between different lines of reasoning. Ensure proper citation in your responses.

Complete your participation in this NSG 6435 assignment with diligence.

Research Focus: Perform research based on your course, textbook readings, and the South University Online Library, focusing on the following:

  • Assessment, diagnostic testing, and management of infectious conditions in a pediatric patient.
  • Differential diagnoses for the presentation of symptoms involving infectious diseases in pediatric patients.

Scenario Evaluation: Consider the following scenario after completing your research:

An eighteen-month-old child, well-known to your practice, presents with a seven-day history of fever ranging from 101 to 104.7 degrees Fahrenheit. On the fourth day of the fever, the emergency department performed blood and urine cultures, a complete blood count, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. The culture reports were negative. Today, the child’s vitals are as follows:

  • Temperature: 101.5 degrees Fahrenheit
  • Heart rate: 120 beats/minute
  • Respiratory rate: 20 breaths/minute
  • Blood pressure: 90/40

Positive physical examination findings include:

  • Injected conjunctiva
  • Palmar redness
  • Magenta-colored lips
  • Red macula
  • Excoriating rashes in the diaper area

Respond to the Following:

Differential Diagnoses:

  • Provide your differential diagnoses for this patient.

Physical Exam Findings:

  • Highlight specific physical exam findings that support your listed differential diagnoses.

Most Concerning Diagnosis:

  • Identify the most concerning diagnosis among the differentials and explain your choice.

Additional Diagnostic Tests:

  • Recommend additional diagnostic tests and provide the rationale for each.

Caregiver Education Focus

  • Outline your focus for caregiver education based on the presented scenario.

NSG 6435 Week 10 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Adolescent Risk Behaviors

This discussion serves as a platform for exploring pertinent topics aligned with this week’s course competencies. Ensure your active participation by posting your initial response to the Discussion Area in NSG 6435.

Guidelines:

  • Utilize your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library to support your work.
  • Cite sources in APA format for all references in your work.
  • Engage with your classmates by reviewing and responding to their postings. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings.
  • Participate actively by posing questions, offering clarifications, providing viewpoints with rationales, challenging discussion aspects, or indicating relationships between lines of reasoning.
  • Cite sources appropriately in your responses.

Angela Cotez VE iHuman Assignment Overview

For this assignment, delve into an iHuman case study aligned with course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core learning objectives, fostering clinical reasoning, ongoing assessments, diagnostic skills, and the development of patient care plans grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Instructions:

  • Access and navigate iHuman using the provided information.
  • Complete the iHuman case titled “Angela Cotez VE” for this week.
  • Apply insights from the iHuman Case Study to address the following questions:

Questions:

Evaluation Tool Description:

  • Describe the evaluation tool and elucidate its essential role in caring for the adolescent patient population.

Application of Research Findings:

  • Apply scholarly research findings to the utilization of this evaluation tool. Describe its validity and reliability based on the literature.

Application to Patient Situation:

  • Apply the evaluation tool to a patient situation. Summarize your opinion on the results obtained.

Plan of Care:

  • Based on the results, outline a plan of care for the patient.

Ensure your responses align with the provided format and address the assigned questions comprehensively.

NSG 6435 All Week Assignments Latest SU

NSG 6435 Week 1 Assignment 3

As part of your weekly requirements, it is essential to log your patient encounters in eMedley. Your faculty will assess that you engage with an appropriate number and variety of patients for a robust learning experience. Additionally, you must create at least one comprehensive SOAP note using the Pediatric SOAP Note template, with the note aligning with the week’s covered content. Submit the completed note to the designated Dropbox and remember to incorporate the reference number from eMedley.

NSG 6435 Week 1 -10 Assignment Help

NSG 6435 Week 1 Discussion

Discussion: Pediatric Health-Care Services

This discussion assignment serves as a platform to explore pertinent topics for the week, aligning with the covered course competencies.

Instructions:

  1. Ensure you initiate the discussion by posting your initial response in the Discussion Area.
  2. Utilize your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library to support your arguments.
  3. Employ proper APA format for citations and references throughout your work.

Engagement Guidelines:

  1. Commence your participation early by reviewing and responding to classmates’ postings.
  2. Respond substantively to at least two classmates’ initial postings.
  3. Actively contribute to the discussion by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting well-reasoned viewpoints, challenging aspects, or indicating logical connections in the discussion.
  4. Integrate citations from relevant sources in your responses to classmates.

Completion Instructions:

Fully engage in the discussion by fulfilling the requirements outlined above.

Research and Response:

Perform research using your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library on the following topics:

  1. Sources of pediatric primary care in the United States
  2. Current status of pediatric health-care services in the United States
  3. Barriers to health care for children in the United States

After your research, respond to the following questions:

  1. Identify the sources of pediatric primary care in the United States and evaluate their adequacy in delivering health-care services to the pediatric population. Provide reasons for your assessment.
  2. Explore whether specific pediatric populations face challenges in accessing health-care services and explain the reasons behind any identified disparities.
  3. Examine the existing barriers preventing children from accessing health-care services in the United States, and elucidate the underlying reasons for the existence of these barriers.

NSG 6435 Week 2 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Developmental Assessment and Biological Functioning

This discussion assignment serves as a platform for exploring relevant topics based on the covered course competencies for the week. Ensure your initial response is posted in the Discussion Area.

Instructions:

  1. Support your responses using your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library.
  2. Employ proper APA format for citations and references throughout your work.

Engagement Guidelines:

  1. Initiate your participation early by reviewing and responding to classmates’ postings.
  2. Substantively respond to at least two classmates’ initial postings.
  3. Actively contribute to the discussion through questioning, clarification, presenting viewpoints with rationale, challenging aspects, or indicating logical connections. Ensure proper citation of sources in your responses.

Completion Instructions:

Fully engage in the discussion by fulfilling the requirements outlined above.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study aligning with the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases are designed to reinforce core learning objectives essential for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, these cases will aid in developing clinical reasoning, ongoing assessments, diagnostic skills, and formulating patient care plans grounded in current clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

iHuman Case for the Week: Complete the iHuman case titled “Buddy (Theodore, Jr.) VE.”

Discussion Questions:

Importance of Developmental Assessment:

  • Why is developmental assessment crucial in providing primary care for infants, children, and adolescents?
    • What are the essential components of this assessment based on a child’s age?

Tools for Developmental Assessment:

  • Which tools will you use to assess specific components of development (speech, motor skills, social skills, etc.)?
    • Identify the tools you believe are the most accurate for assessing developmental components and provide reasons.

Biological Functioning Assessment:

  • Which components will you consider in assessing the basic biological functioning and well-being of your pediatric patients?
    • Explain the significance of these components in providing primary health-care services to children.

NSG 6435 Week 3 Discussion

Discussion: MedU Case Study – Developmental Evaluation and Screening

This discussion assignment offers an opportunity to delve into pertinent topics for the week, aligned with the covered course competencies. Ensure your initial response is posted in the Discussion Area.

Guidelines:

  1. Utilize your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library, citing sources in APA format.
  2. Actively engage with classmates by responding to their postings, posing questions, providing clarifications, presenting viewpoints with rationale, challenging perspectives, or indicating logical connections. Ensure proper citation of sources in your responses.

Completion Instructions:

Active participation in the discussion is expected, including responses to classmates and adherence to APA format.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will delve into a MedU case study, aligning with course objectives and weekly content. MedU cases are designed to reinforce core learning objectives in an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, these cases will enhance clinical reasoning, ongoing assessments, diagnostic skills, and the formulation of patient care plans grounded in current clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Access and Navigation Information for MedU: Click here for details on how to access and navigate MedU.

MedU Case for the Week: Complete the MedU case titled “FmCase 2: Infant well-child (2, 6, and 9 months) – Asia.”

Discussion Questions:

History Taking for Well-Child Visit

  • Discuss the history you would gather for Asia in preparation for the well-child visit.
    • Include appropriate questions regarding Asia’s growth and development based on her age.

Developmental Tool Description

  • Describe the developmental tool to be used for Asia, including its reliability and validity.
    • Report on how Asia scored developmentally on this tool. Is she developmentally appropriate for her age?

Immunizations, Patient Education, and Follow-Up

  • Identify the immunizations Asia will receive at this visit.
    • Outline the patient education plan and discuss any recommended follow-up actions.

NSG 6435 Week 4 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – HEENT and Respiratory Infections

This discussion forum serves as a platform to explore relevant topics aligned with the covered course competencies this week. Ensure your initial response is posted in the Discussion Area.

Guidelines:

Utilize Resources

  • Base your contributions on readings from the course textbook and the South University Online Library.
    • Cite your sources in APA format for all contentions and provide proper references.

Active Participation

  • Initiate your contributions early in the week.
    • Engage with classmates by responding to their posts.
    • Participation can take the form of questioning, providing clarifications, presenting viewpoints with rationale, challenging aspects of the discussion, or indicating logical connections.
    • Ensure citations in your responses to classmates.

Assignment Completion

  • Respond to at least two classmates’ initial postings.
    • Demonstrate active participation by engaging in a meaningful way with your peers.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will immerse yourself in an iHuman case study, aligning with course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases play a pivotal role in fostering clinical reasoning, leveraging ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and shaping patient care plans grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Accessing iHuman: To complete this week’s assignment, navigate through the iHuman case titled “Katherine Harris.” For information on accessing and navigating iHuman,

Discussion Questions:

Antibiotic Use:

  • Do you recommend a limited or involved use of antibiotics in treating the diseases presented, along with other unconfirmed bacterial illnesses? Why or why not?
    • Elaborate on the standards governing antibiotic use in the pediatric population. What assessment findings would warrant prescribing an antibiotic for asthma symptoms?

Asthma Action Plan:

  • Drawing from national guidelines and evidence-based literature, formulate an Asthma Action Plan tailored for this patient.

Wheezing in Children:

  • Explore whether the etiology, diagnosis, and management of wheezing in a child vary based on age. Provide reasons for your perspective.
    • Identify which objective clinical findings will guide your diagnosis and explain why.
    • Discuss the circumstances under which a chest x-ray is indicated in this specific case.

Ensure to adhere to the specified format and complete your participation by the assignment deadline.

NSG 6435 Week 5 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders in Children

This discussion serves as a platform to explore relevant topics aligned with the course competencies for this week. Ensure your initial response is posted in the Discussion Area.

Guidelines:

  1. Utilize Resources:
    • Base your contributions on readings from the course textbook and the South University Online Library.
    • Cite your sources in APA format for all contentions and provide proper references.
  2. Active Participation:
    • Initiate your contributions early in the week.
    • Engage with classmates by responding to their posts.
    • Participation can take the form of questioning, providing clarifications, presenting viewpoints with rationale, challenging aspects of the discussion, or indicating logical connections.
    • Ensure citations in your responses to classmates.
  3. Assignment Completion:
    • Respond to at least two classmates’ initial postings.
    • Demonstrate active participation by engaging in a meaningful way with your peers.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will immerse yourself in an iHuman case study, aligning with course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases play a pivotal role in fostering clinical reasoning, leveraging ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and shaping patient care plans grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Accessing iHuman: To complete this week’s assignment, navigate through the iHuman case titled “Robert Ross.”

Discussion Questions:

Diagnostic Information Gathering

  • What questions would you pose to gather crucial diagnostic information from Robert Ross?

Diagnosis and Management

  • How would you diagnose and manage a 17-year-old male presenting with acute chest pain, palpitations, fever, and malaise?

Recommended Diagnostic Studies

  • Outline the diagnostic studies you would recommend for Robert, providing a rationale for each, including labs.

Concerning Findings

  • What physical exam findings and diagnostic results would be concerning to you, and why?

Differentials and Life-Threatening Diagnoses

  • Identify three potential differentials for this case. Additionally, highlight life-threatening diagnoses that must be considered when a patient presents with acute chest pain.

Treatment and Family Education

  • Propose the treatment plan for Robert, along with the rationale. Outline education points for the family.

NSG 6435 Week 6 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Common Pediatric Illnesses

This week’s discussion forum serves as a platform to delve into significant topics aligned with the covered course competencies. It is imperative to initiate the discourse with your primary response in the dedicated Discussion Area.

In adherence to the guidelines:

Reference Utilization: Leverage insights from your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Ensure the incorporation of proper citations in APA format, including references for all cited materials.

Interactive Engagement: Kickstart your contributions early in the week, actively participating by responding to at least two initial postings from classmates. Contribute meaningfully to the discussion through various means, such as posing questions, providing clarifications, presenting viewpoints with rationales, challenging aspects, or establishing connections between lines of reasoning. Substantiate your responses with credible citations.

Assignment Fulfillment: Demonstrate active participation by completing your contributions for this assignment.

For this discussion, immerse yourself in the iHuman case study titled “Samantha Graves, Gastroenteritis.” iHuman cases play a pivotal role in honing clinical reasoning, utilizing ongoing assessments, diagnostic skills, and crafting patient care plans based on the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Accessing iHuman: To fulfill this week’s assignment, access the iHuman case titled “Samantha Graves, Gastroenteritis.”

Discussion Questions:

  1. Essential Questions for Bloody Diarrhea: Outline essential questions for a pediatric patient or caregiver when the presenting complaint is bloody diarrhea. Discuss whether these questions vary based on the child’s age and provide reasons for your stance. Identify clinical or historical findings necessitating diagnostic studies and explain why. Specify the initial diagnostic studies you would order and the rationale.
  2. Differential Diagnoses: Propose three potential differential diagnoses for the presented case.
  3. Vomiting Across Age Groups: Analyze the differences in common causes of vomiting in infants, children, and adolescents. Identify clinical or historical findings guiding the need for diagnostic studies. Specify the initial diagnostic studies you would order and elucidate the reasons behind your choices.

NSG 6435 Week 8 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

This week’s discussion segment provides an avenue to explore pertinent themes aligned with the covered course competencies. Commence the discourse by sharing your initial response in the designated Discussion Area.

Reference Integration: Support your insights with references from your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. Ensure meticulous citation of sources, adhering to the APA format.

Active Participation: Engage proactively by commencing your contributions early in the week. Respond thoughtfully to at least two initial postings from classmates. Actively participate by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting well-founded viewpoints, challenging aspects, or illustrating connections between different lines of reasoning. Citations should accompany your responses, enhancing credibility.

Assignment Completion: Demonstrate your active involvement by fulfilling the participation requirements for this assignment.

For this discussion, immerse yourself in the iHuman case study titled “Timoth Adams, VE.” iHuman cases serve as instrumental tools for fostering clinical reasoning, employing ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and formulating patient care plans grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

Accessing iHuman: To fulfill the requirements of this week’s assignment, access the iHuman case titled “Timoth Adams, VE.”

Discussion Inquiries:

  1. Best Course of Action: Share your perspective on the optimal course of action for Timoth Adams’ appointment.
  2. Diagnostic Studies and Rationale: Identify clinical or historical findings warranting diagnostic studies and elucidate the rationale behind their necessity. Specify the diagnostic studies you would initially order and provide reasoning.
  3. Differential Diagnoses: Propose three potential differentials for the case.

NSG 6435 Week 9 Discussion

Discussion: Infectious Diseases in Children

In this week’s discussion, we delve into the intricacies of infectious diseases in children, aligning our discourse with the course competencies.

Research Foundation: Underpin your insights with knowledge gleaned from your course materials, textbooks, and the South University Online Library. Uphold academic integrity by citing sources and providing references in the APA format.

Interactive Engagement: Initiate your contributions early in the week by reviewing and responding to your classmates’ posts. Actively participate in the discussion by posing questions, offering clarifications, presenting well-founded viewpoints, challenging aspects, or illustrating connections between different lines of reasoning. Elevate the discourse by citing sources in responses and ensure your engagement is complete for this assignment.

Research Scenario: After conducting thorough research on the assessment, diagnostic testing, and management of infectious conditions in pediatric patients, as well as exploring the differential diagnoses for symptoms related to pediatric infectious diseases, consider the following scenario:

An eighteen-month-old child, with a known medical history, exhibits a seven-day history of fever (101 to 104.7 degrees Fahrenheit). The emergency department conducted blood and urine cultures, a complete blood count, and a comprehensive metabolic panel on the fourth day of the fever, with negative culture reports. Present vitals and physical examination findings include…

Discussion Points:

  1. Differential Diagnoses: Outline potential differential diagnoses for the presented case.
  2. Supporting Physical Exam Findings: Identify specific physical exam findings that substantiate your chosen differential diagnoses.
  3. Concerning Diagnosis: Evaluate and highlight which of the listed differentials is the most concerning.
  4. Additional Diagnostic Tests: Recommend supplementary diagnostic tests and elucidate the rationale behind each recommendation.
  5. Caregiver Education Focus: Define the primary focus for educating the caregiver based on the presented information.

NSG 6435 Week 10 Discussion

Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Adolescent Risk Behaviors

Discussion Assignment Overview

This discussion serves as a platform to explore pertinent topics aligned with the week’s course competencies. Ensure active participation by posting your initial response in the Discussion Area.

Guidelines for Effective Contribution:

  1. Source Utilization: Employ insights from your course textbook readings and leverage resources from the South University Online Library. Maintain academic integrity by appropriately citing sources and providing references in the APA format.
  2. Interactive Engagement: Initiate your involvement early in the week by reviewing and responding to classmates’ posts. Foster a dynamic discussion by responding to at least two initial postings, incorporating elements such as questions, clarifications, viewpoints with rationales, challenges, or connections between different lines of reasoning. In your responses, integrate relevant sources to substantiate your points.
  3. Participation Deadline: Complete your participation in this assignment by Wednesday, October 4, 2017, to ensure a comprehensive and timely contribution.

iHuman Case Study Assignment

  1. Objective and Scope: Undertake the iHuman case study titled “Angela Cotez VE” to address core learning objectives essential for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, these cases will facilitate the honing of clinical reasoning, ongoing assessments, diagnostic skills, and the formulation of patient care plans grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.
  2. Interactive Learning Platform: Recognize the iHuman assignments as highly interactive and dynamic components that can potentially impact quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam. Familiarize yourself with the information on accessing and navigating iHuman.

Application of iHuman Case Study

  1. Evaluation Tool: Describe the evaluation tool and elucidate its significance in caring for the adolescent patient population.
  2. Integration of Scholarly Research: Apply findings from scholarly research articles to evaluate the tool, emphasizing its validity and reliability.
  3. Practical Application: Apply the evaluation tool to a specific patient situation and provide a summarized opinion on the results obtained.
  4. Care Plan Formulation: Based on the results, outline a comprehensive plan of care tailored to the patient.

Related Services

Share your love